Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Martin, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
Tbis is an appeal from tbe judgment of tbe United States Customs Court, Second Division, Abstract 61,834, overruling tbe importer’s protest and sustaining tbe collector’s classification of tbe merchandise involved herein -under paragraph 1312 of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802 and tbe Torquay Protocol to tbe General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) T.D. 52739, as manufactures in chief value of rayon, not specially provided for, dutiable at tbe rate of 25 cents per pound, plus 35 per centum ad valorem. Tbe importer claimed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smillie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- United States v. China & Japan Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- R. F. Downing & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1905
- China & Japan Trading Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
- Bredt v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bar Zel Expediters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
- General Electric Company-Medical Systems Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Intercontinental Marble Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Xerox Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Xerox Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015