State v. Dodson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals his convictions for criminal conspiracy to commit aggravated murder, ORS 161.450, solicitation to commit aggravated murder, ORS 161.435, and attempted murder. ORS 161.405; ORS 163.115.
Defendant first argues that his demurrer should have been allowed, because the indictment does not adequately identify his co-conspirators. The indictment was sufficient.
The court imposed consecutive sentences on the convictions on the conspiracy and solicitation counts. The state concedes that the consecutive sentences are unlawful, because those convictions merge under ORS 161.485. We agree.
De…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. KnuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. WeeksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992