Legal Opinion

State v. Dodson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1992No. C 90-04-32061; CA A67852PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his convictions for criminal conspiracy to commit aggravated murder, ORS 161.450, solicitation to commit aggravated murder, ORS 161.435, and attempted murder. ORS 161.405; ORS 163.115.

Defendant first argues that his demurrer should have been allowed, because the indictment does not adequately identify his co-conspirators. The indictment was sufficient.

The court imposed consecutive sentences on the convictions on the conspiracy and solicitation counts. The state concedes that the consecutive sentences are unlawful, because those convictions merge under ORS 161.485. We agree.

De…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. KnuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. WeeksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API