Legal Opinion

State v. Knupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 27, 1996No. C94-07-34394; CA A87645PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of third-degree robbery after a jury trial. ORS 164.405(1). On appeal, he assigns error to the trial court’s imposition of a compensatory fine as a condition of post-prison supervision. We affirm.

The trial court sentenced defendant to a 12-month prison term and a 24-month term of post-prison supervision. It also imposed a $1,000 compensatory fine as a condition of his post-prison supervision. Defendant’s counsel objected to the imposition of the fine as a condition of post-prison supervision, arguing that the court’s authority was limited to recommending that the fine…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. WilcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API