Hankinson v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KRAFT, District Judge.
The United States, one of two defendants in this case, moves to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that the pleading itself discloses that plaintiff’s claim against the government is barred by the statute of limitations.
Plaintiff’s original complaint, filed July 17, 1956, sought recovery only against the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., for an injury suffered on July 29, 1955. The railroad answered on August 10, 1956’ and, some months later, joined the United States as third-party defendant. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kincheloe v. FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Gideon J. Rohner, Jr. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- A. G. Reeves Steel Const. Co. v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Lomax Ex Rel. Lomax v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Berry v. HellerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Larson MacHine, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Peneschi v. National Steel Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- L & H TRANSP., INC. v. Drew Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Straub v. Desa Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Frankel v. BackDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.