Legal Opinion

David N. Berks v. United States of America, United States of America v. David N. Berks. United States of America v. Samuel K. Spaise

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 31, 1988No. 88-5041PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

David N. Berks appeals for the second time from an order of the district court 1 denying his motion for attorney fees under 26 U.S.C. § 7430. Berks originally filed his motion after prevailing in an action against the United States for a refund of taxes paid to the Internal Revenue Service. The district court denied the motion and Berks appealed to this court. The panel hearing the appeal determined that, in order for this court to conduct a meaningful review, a remand was necessary for the purpose of obtaining further findings of fact and conclusions of law from the district court. Berks v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eva E. Wickert v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  2. David N. Berks v. United States of America, Samuel K. SpaiseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sokol v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  2. Gantner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  3. Zinniel v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. John C. Zinniel v. Commissioner Of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Estate of Merchant v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API