David N. Berks v. United States of America, Samuel K. Spaise
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the district court erred in denying plaintiff-appellant David N. Berks’ motion for litigation costs and attorney’s fees under 26 U.S.C. § 7430. We remand the case to the district court for further findings.
The underlying cause of action in this case involved a claim by Berks for a refund of taxes paid pursuant to an assessment by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) under 26 U.S.C. § 6672. Berks instituted the suit after the IRS administratively denied his request for an abatement of the assessment. Following a five day trial, a…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Frank E. & Mildred E. Rickel v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Zinniel v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Michael A. Cramer, Mai, Srpa, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Helen Pate William Whitfield Pate Julia Ruth Pate Kirksey McCord Pate v. United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- David N. Berks v. United States of America, United States of America v. David N. Berks. United States of America v. Samuel K. SpaiseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.