Legal Opinion

Apollo v. Kim Anh Pham

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 11, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

224 N.J. Super. 89 (1987)

539 A.2d 1222

BENJAMIN APOLLO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

KIM ANH PHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 1, 1987.

Decided December 11, 1987.

Before Judges DEIGHAN, HAVEY and MUIR.

Edward J. Bowen argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (Edward J. Bowen on the brief).

Robert C. Rivas argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Bergen County Legal Services, attorneys; Robert C. Rivas on the brief).

2Per curiam

The judgment of the Chancery Division denying a trial by jury is affirmed essentially for…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Apollo v. Kim Anh PhamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brennan v. OrbanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Boardwalk Properties v. BPHC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  3. Brennan v. OrbanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API