Brennan v. Orban
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
145 N.J. 282 (1996)
678 A.2d 667
MARY BRENNAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JOSEPH S. ORBAN, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MARY KATHRYN BRENNAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JOSEPH S. ORBAN, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 14, 1996.
Decided July 16, 1996.
Steven K. Warner argued the cause for appellant (Satterlee, Stephens, Burke & Burke and Charles H. Brandt, attorneys; Thomas V. Manahan, of counsel).
Robert J. Durst, II and Beth G. Baldinger argued the cause for respondent (Stark & Stark, attorneys; Mr. Durst, Ms. Baldinger, and Sudha T. Kantor, on the briefs).
The opinion…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Lepis v. LepisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Shaner v. Horizon Bancorp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.