Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Orban

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 16, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

145 N.J. 282 (1996)

678 A.2d 667

MARY BRENNAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

JOSEPH S. ORBAN, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MARY KATHRYN BRENNAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

JOSEPH S. ORBAN, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 14, 1996.

Decided July 16, 1996.

Steven K. Warner argued the cause for appellant (Satterlee, Stephens, Burke & Burke and Charles H. Brandt, attorneys; Thomas V. Manahan, of counsel).

Robert J. Durst, II and Beth G. Baldinger argued the cause for respondent (Stark & Stark, attorneys; Mr. Durst, Ms. Baldinger, and Sudha T. Kantor, on the briefs).

The opinion…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Lepis v. LepisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. Shaner v. Horizon Bancorp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API