Legal Opinion
In Re Passaic County Utilities Auth.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 22, 2000PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
753 A.2d 661 (2000)
164 N.J. 270
In the Matter of PASSAIC COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY PETITION REQUESTING DETERMINATION OF FINANCIAL DIFFICULTY AND APPLICATION FOR REFINANCING APPROVAL.
City of Paterson and Martin G. Barnes, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders and Passaic County Utilities Authority, Defendants-Respondents, and
Township of Wayne, Borough of Totowa, Borough of West Paterson, City of Clifton, Borough of Wananque, Borough of Bloomingdale, Borough of Hawthorne, Borough of Ringwood, Borough of Pompton Lakes, and Township of West Milford,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of ClarkstownSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Bergen Commercial Bank v. SislerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. BunchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Lozano v. Frank DeLuca ConstructionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Asbury Park Press v. Ocean County Prosecutor's OfficeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Matturri v. Board of Trustees of the Judicial Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Stephen Meehan v. Peter Antonellis, Dmd(075265)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.