Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Wolke

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 24, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The basic theory underlying the entire question of .costs is that they “ are certain allowances authorized by statute to reimburse the successful party for expenses incurred in prosecuting or defending an action or special proceeding.” (Stevens v. Central Nat. Bank, 168 N. Y. 560, 566.)

In view of this principle, it is a primary rule “ that the successful party, although he may be denied costs, never pays them.” (Stevens v. Central Nat. Bank, supra.)

While under section 276 of the Surrogate’s Court Act the source of the payment of such costs as may be awarded is discretionary with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Central National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. In re the Estate of RogersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
  3. In re the Estate of SloatNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Adoption of ManziNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  2. In re the Estate of EstricherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
  3. In re the Estate of FriedmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. In re the Accounting of O'NeillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  5. In re the Estate of LearyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API