Legal Opinion
Heyne v. METROPOLITAN NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided November 3, 2009No. 3:09-0847PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are a Motion to Dismiss Individual Defendants (Docket No. 5), Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery (Docket No. 7), a Motion to Dismiss Metropolitan Board of Public Education (Docket No. 8), and a Motion to Dismiss the Metropolitan Government (Docket No. 10).
For the reasons stated herein, the Motion to Dismiss Individual Defendants (Docket No. 5) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery (Docket No. 7) is DENIED; the Motion to Dismiss Metropolitan Board of Public Education (Docket No. 8) is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hutchison v. Metropolitan GovernmentDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Dillingham v. MillsapsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011