Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, a Corporation v. Tri-State Insurance Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 1, 1967No. 8401PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Hartford had an automobile liability policy on Wininger. Tri-State had a similar policy on Cornett. Wininger, Cor-nett, and Craven, who was not insured, were racing on an Oklahoma public highway. Cornett’s car collided with a car driven by Day causing the death of one passenger in that car and injuries to others. Subsequent law suits resulted in judgments against Wininger, Cornett, and Craven. 1 Hartford paid $85,000 in judgments and seeks contribution from Tri-State. The trial court denied contribution.

The question is whether the rule prohibiting contribution between joint tortfeasors or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Wininger Ex Rel. Wininger v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Wininger Ex Rel. Wininger v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Home Indemnity Company v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James Butler Scales v. Dan M. Reynolds the Attorney General of the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API