State v. Delcambre
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Charlette and Nolan Delcambre petitioned for review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming their convictions of theft in the first degree by welfare fraud. They claim the information charging them with the crime was constitutionally defective because it failed to allege "intent to deprive" as an essential element of the crime. We hold that "intent to deprive" is not an element of the crime of welfare fraud, and affirm the petitioners' convictions.
Charlette and Nolan Delcambre, wife and husband, were charged by information with theft in the first degree by welfare fraud. The information…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. MicheauxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- State v. SassWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. KomokWashington Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MoavenzadehWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MoavenzadehWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. TinkerWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. TinkerWashington Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.