Legal Opinion
Barson v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 2, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVincent A. Lupiano, J.
Plaintiff moves pursuant to rule 3212 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules for summary judgment; defendant also moves for the same relief.
Defendant has asserted a counterclaim, and each party seeks a declaratory judgment with respect to its rights and relations under the subject policy. The facts are not disputed.
A standard automobile liability policy was issued by the defendant General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation to Buxbaum Linens, Inc. With the latter’s permission the insured vehicle was operated by the plaintiff William Barson. While he was operating the vehicle his wife, a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morgan v. Greater New York Taxpayers Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Jacobs v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- Manhattan Casualty Co. v. CholakisNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Manhattan Casualty Co. v. CholakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- NAT. FARMERS UNION PROP. & CAS. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985