Legal Opinion

King v. King

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 2001No. WD 58514PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert G. Ulrich, J.

Terri Nelson King (Wife) appeals the trial court’s judgment of dissolution dissolving her marriage to Cordell King (Husband) and distributing property. She claims that the trial court erred in (1) finding that the antenuptial agreement was valid, (2) setting aside certain property acquired during the marriage as Husband’s separate property, (3) failing to award her attorney’s fees, and (4) failing to restore her maiden name. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case is remanded with directions.

Husband and Wife were married on May 31, 1994. This was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Silcox v. SilcoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. In re the Marriage of LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Long v. LongMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. D.K.H. v. L.R.G.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Hanna v. HannaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Morgan v. McBeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Dkh v. LrgMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API