Legal Opinion

Keller v. Sixty-01 Associates of Apartment Owners

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 23, 2005No. 53370-3-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 In 1992, the members of the Sixty-01 Associates of Apartment Owners voted to change the assessment method for allocating common expenses of the condominium complex. In 1999, after deciding that the vote to change the assessment method violated Washington condominium law and Sixty-01’s own Declaration, the Board of Sixty-01 revoked the 1992 amendment and returned to the prior assessment method. Appellants Louis and Betty Keller, members of Sixty-01, filed a complaint regarding this revocation. Sixty-01 claimed the 1992 amendment was void ab initio due to its improper adoption. We hold that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Youngblood v. SchiremanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Hartstene Point Maintenance Ass'n v. DiehlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Club Envy of Spokane, LLC v. Ridpath Tower Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Bogomolov v. Lake Villas Condominium Ass'n of Apartment OwnersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Bogomolov v. LAKE VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API