Legal Opinion

Berla v. Strauss

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 12, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On final hearing on bill, answer, replication and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Howell, V. C.

The hill in this case is filed for the purpose of having this court decree a resulting trust in favor of the complainant in a tract of land in the northern part of the city of Newark. Some time in 1891 the complainant, Berla, with Barnard Strauss and Samuel A. Smith became partners under the firm name of Strauss, Smith & Berla and were engaged in the manufacture of fertilizers upon the plot of land in question. The title to the land was in a corporation known as the Newark Sanitary and Manufacturing Company. This company in 1891 mortgaged the premises in question to August Rommel…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Turner v. ColeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Culley v. CarrNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  3. Wallace v. DuntonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In Re HudspethNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API