Legal Opinion

Culley v. Carr

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 19, 1946No. Docket 149/656PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"He that hath committed iniquity shall not have equity" is the embodiment of a broad, general principle displayed in the form of a familiar maxim. The complainants are the daughters and heirs-at-law of one John Carr, who died intestate in 1942. The defendant is the brother of the deceased.

On July 15th, 1921, Paul F. Williams conveyed to the defendant and to James Healey, a brother-in-law of John Carr, a parcel of land situate in the Township of Franklin, in the County of Somerset. On August 23d 1926, James Healey together with his wife conveyed his undivided half interest in the premises to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. Bank of Rockville Center Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Turner v. ColeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Robertson v. . SayreNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Hildebrand v. WilligNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903
  5. Turner v. ColeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John Julian Construction Co. v. Monarch Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. Brown v. PepersackDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  3. Pope v. BainNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. O'Neal v. O'NealNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API