Legal Opinion

Alabama Clay Products Co. v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 18, 1933No. 6 Div. 194PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The city of Birmingham sued to recover ad valorem taxes claimed to be due on the shares of stock in Alabama Clay Products Company, a domestic corporation, for the years 1926 to 1930, inclusive.

The sole question presented- on appeal is: What was the situs of the corporation for purpose of taxing the shares?

The evidence is without dispute, consisting in part of agreed facts, and in part of the oral testimony of Judge E. N. I-Iamill, witness called by defendant.

The certificate of incorporation, filed in the probate office of Jefferson county, Ala., on November 20,1921, recited: “ ‘C. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Western Transportation Company v. . ScheuNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Inter-Southern Life Insurance v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Georgia Fire Insurance v. City of CedartownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  2. Jackson Securities & Inv. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Willamette National Lumber Co. v. Circuit CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Higgins v. Hampshire Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Tennessee Coal, Iron R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API