Legal Opinion
Neel v. State
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1995No. 940282PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Justice:
Plaintiff Sue Neel brought this action against her employer, the State of Utah, to collect personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits under Utah’s Automobile No-Fault Insurance Act. The State initially moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with the requirements of the Governmental Immunity Act. The trial court granted the motion without prejudice. On appeal, the Utah Court of Appeals held that because the action sounded in contract, the procedural requirements of the immunity act did not . apply. Neel v. State, 854 P.2d 581, 585 (Utah Ct.App.1993).
On remand, the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CallUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Sullivan v. Scoular Grain Co. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- In re Criminal Investigation, 7th District Court No. CS-1Utah Supreme Court · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lieber v. ITT Hartford Insurance Center, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
- Eaton Kenway, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Eaquinta v. Allstate Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. FigarattoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Bullock v. State, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.