Legal Opinion

Fishel v. Irwin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 17, 1913No. 19,357PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Fred D. King, Judge. Action by Lewis Fishel against Michael Irwin and another, in which the Interstate Trust & Banking Company and others intervene. From a judgment for plaintiff and interveners, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.

Plaintiff sues defendant on three promissory notes, aggregating $3,910.50, made and issued by the defendant Michael Irwin.

The Interstate Trust & Banking Company, the holder of the defendant’s promissory note for $1,000, the liquidators of the Louisiana National Bank, holders and owners of three other promissory notes, aggregating $3,150, and the liquidators of the Canal Bank & Trust Company, the holders and owners of five other certain promissory notes, aggregating $3,300, intervene in the suit, joining plaintiff in all of the allegations contained in his petition; and all ask for judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lovell v. PayneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  2. Keane v. BrandenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  3. Taylor v. KnoxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1830
  4. Appleby v. A. Lehman & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  5. Gerspach v. MullinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1873

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harman v. DefattaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Ory Bros. v. MullerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Southland Inv. Co. v. MichelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Bullard v. NattinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Elston, Prince & McDade, Inc. v. First State Bank of Plain DealingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API