Legal Opinion

Hajela v. ING Groep, N.V.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 26, 2008No. 3:07-cv-01107PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING RE: ING GROEP, N.V.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (DOC. NO. 55)

JANET C. HALL, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Sourabh Hajela, brings this action against defendants, ING Groep, N.V., Inc. (“ING Groep”), ING North America Insurance Corporation (“NAIC”), Catherine Smith and Steve Van Wyk, both in their individual capacities, alleging retaliation and wrongful termination in violation of Title VII of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 1 , 18 U.S.C § 1514A, the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a) (“FMLA”), and Connecticut General Statutes §§…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. D.H. Blair & Co. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. DIRECTBUY, INC.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
  2. Martin v. ReliaStar Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
  3. Robb v. RobbDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
  4. Bogden-Cozmuta v. Granby Urgent Care, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
  5. Seo v. H Mart Midwest Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API