Westbrook International, LLC v. Westbrook Technologies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is presently before the Court qn Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Arbitration. The issue presented is whether the Federal Arbitration Act governs the arbitrability of claims where a choice-of-law clause specifies Ontario as the governing law in an international agreement. This opinion sets forth the Court’s decision. 1
II. FACTS
On August 1, 1997, Westbrook International, L.L.C. (“International”), a Michigan corporation, filed a complaint seeking to compel arbitration. International’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Cape Flattery Ltd. v. Titan Maritime LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2009
- Sea Bowld Marine Group, LDC v. Oceanfast Pty, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2006