Legal Opinion
Standard & Poor's Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 25, 1989No. 87 Civ. 6543 KCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONBOY, District Judge:
In 1980, defendant Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) issued to Standard & Poor’s (“S & P”), a prominent publisher of business and financial information, an insurance policy covering loss from, inter alia, “any act, error or omis sion, misleading statement or misstatement” committed by S & P. The policy provided for a $500,000 deductible per “occurrence” and a $20,000,000 liability limit per “occurrence” with an annual aggregate liability limit of $20,000,000. “Occurrence” is defined in the policy as follows:
“Occurrence” means all…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- International Paper Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- American Home Products Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- American Home Products Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- RTG Furniture Corp. v. Industrial Risk InsurersDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Upper Deck Co. v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007