Legal Opinion
Upper Deck Co. v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 28, 2007No. 05CV1945 IEG (RBB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER [1] LIFTING STAY, [2] GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD and [3] DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD
[Doc. Nos. 17, 37]
GONZALEZ, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court is Upper Deck’s and Richard P. McWilliam’s (collectively, “plaintiffs”) motion to vacate an arbitration award in favor of American International Speciality Lines Insurance (“AISLIC”). (Doc. No. 17.) AISLIC has filed a cross-motion to confirm the same arbitration award, which declared that plaintiffs were entitled to no coverage under AISLIC’s policy. (Doc. No. 37.) For the reasons…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Jack BobkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Beal Savings Bank v. SommerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Milos Sovak, M.D. Biophysica, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., a Corporation of the Empire of Japan Cook Imaging Corporation, an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Sheet Metal Workers' International Association Local Union No. 359 v. Madison Industries, Inc., of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The Upper Deck Company, LLC v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008