Legal Opinion

State v. Wade

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 1, 1916PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Buchanan Criminal Court. — lion. Thomas F. Ryan, Judge. (1) It is the inflexible rule in criminal pleadings that in all indictments or informations for felonies, nothing can he left to intendment or implication, and judged hv this rule, the information in the present case is insufficient.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Buchanan Criminal Court. — lion. Thomas F. Ryan, Judge. (1) It is the inflexible rule in criminal pleadings that in all indictments or informations for felonies, nothing can he left to intendment or implication, and judged hv this rule, the information in the present case is insufficient. The indictment nowhere alleges the nature of the game which was played; it is not alleged that the game of craps was played; it is not alleged that a game of chance was played, and fails to allege that any game was played for either money or property. As sustaining the general principles which…

1Opinion of the CourtRevelle, J.

On the 2nd day of March, 1914, the prosecuting attorney of Buchanan County filed in the criminal court of that county an information, which, omitting formal parts, is as follows:

“That at said county Richard Wade at 118% North Fifth Street, in the city of St. Joseph . . . did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously set up and keep a certain table and gambling device commonly called a crap table, which said crap table was then §nd there and on said other days and times a gambling device adapted, devised and designed for the purpose of playing games of chance for money and property;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. TerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. State v. RosenblattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. State v. BryantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  4. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex parte AmosSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Ex Parte AmosSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Goodloe v. WurdemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Hartman v. Merged Area VI Community CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API