Legal Opinion

Borland v. Key System Transit Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff as the result of collision between an automobile in which she was riding and a streetcar operated by defendant transit company, defendant has appealed from judgment in her favor upon three grounds, to wit: Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict and judgment, errors in instructions and prejudicial misconduct of counsel for plaintiff.

The collision occurred August 14, 1924, about 8 P. M., at the intersection of Fifty-eighth Street and Telegraph Avenue, a heavily traveled main thoroughfare between Oakland…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Clark v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Morris v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Wills v. JJ Newberry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API