Legal Opinion

Krichau v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1948No. 32429PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This is an action at law to recover a money judgment for damage to plaintiff’s land and crops which he claims was caused by the negligence of the defendant. At the conclusion of all of the evidence the defendant moved for a directed verdict. The trial court sustained the motion and dismissed the plaintiff’s petition. Upon the over*500ruling of a motion for new trial, plaintiff perfected this appeal.

The case was tried and determined upon the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s evidence to establish negligence on the part of the defendant as constituting the proximate cause of damage sustained by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fairmont Creamery Co. v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hessler v. BellamyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Halliday v. RaymondNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Goodhart v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pullen v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Coyle v. StopakNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Snyder v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Weston Ex Rel. Weston v. Gold & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Thomas v. OwensNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API