Legal Opinion

Goodhart v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1945No. 31919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is an action against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company for damages Tor the destruction of growing crops by floodwaters which were caused to back up on the plaintiff’s land because of the alleged improper construction of a culvert under the railroad track. At the close of all of the evidence, the trial court instructed the jury-to return a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff is the owner of a tract of bottom land in Richardson county, on the south line of which there is a county highway running east and west, and a quarter of a mile south of this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fulcher v. IkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Redwelski v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Craig v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Harris v. Lincoln & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Webb v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stolting v. EverettNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Krichau v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hahn v. Weber & Sons Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API