Legal Opinion

Virginian Joint Stock Land Bank v. Hudson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934No. Docket No. 58, Calendar No. 37,520Published

1Opinion

July 3, 1925, defendant, then a single man, made, executed and delivered a promissory note in the sum of $7,000 to the Columbus Joint Stock Land Bank of Columbus, Ohio, payable with interest at 6 per cent. per annum, on an amortization plan, in 65 semi-annual instalments of $245 each, and one additional instalment of $204.61. It was provided that if default was made in the payment of any instalment payment, the legal holder of the note might declare the whole debt immediately due and payable. To secure the Columbus Joint Stock Land Bank the payment of the sum of money mentioned in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Youngs v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API