Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hamil v. Bashline

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1976No. 321Published

1ConcurrenceHoffman, Judge

Appellant, plaintiff in- a medical malpractice action, contends that the lower court erred when it instructed the jury on the issue of proximate cause. This case comes to us after a second trial which was ordered by our Court. Hamil v. Bashline, 224 Pa.Super. 407, 307 A.2d 57 (1973), allocatur denied, 224 Pa.Super. xxxvi. The Majority overrules Bashline I, While I agree with the reasoning of the Dissenting Opinion by CERCONE, J., which reaffirms and clarifies the holding of Bashline I, I do not agree that the charge of the lower court considered in its entirety was defective that we should…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  3. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Majors v. Brodhead HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API