Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Lee Toma & Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Exceptions from Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, J.

A material question raised by the exceptions in this case is whether the action was for breach of an implied or an express agreement. At the opening of the plaintiff’s case to the jury the plaintiff in answer to the defendant’s inquiry whether he claimed that “an express contract was entered into under the terms of which one-half was to be paid to the plaintiff” said, “We are sueing on a quantum meruit.” To the defendant’s further inquiry, “And counsel states that there was an express contract entered into ?” answer was made, “That there, was an *696express…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The BANK OF COLUMBIA v. PATTERSON’S Adm’rSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Woodrow v. HawvingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. O'Conner v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Foltz v. CogswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Sullivan v. Iron Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pak Sau v. FerreiraHawaii Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API