Legal Opinion

Neuma, Inc. v. Wells Fargo & Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 19, 2006No. 04 C 4213PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Neuma, Inc. (“Neuma”) entered into a viatical settlement with Rudy Ock-huysen (“Ockhuysen”), an employee on disability leave from Defendant Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”), in which Ockhuysen assigned his rights as a beneficiary under his employer-sponsored group life insurance policy to Neuma in exchange for a lump sum payment. Shortly thereafter, Wells Fargo terminated Ockhuysen’s employment pursuant to a company policy of limiting disability leaves to 30 months. As neither Neuma nor Ockhuysen subsequently…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Peter H. Bombard v. Fort Wayne Newspapers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Mary Ruffin-Thompkins v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Christopoulos v. TroutDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Killian v. Concert Health PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  3. Christopoulos v. Prudential Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Furst v. MayneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  5. Futterman v. United Employee Benefit FundDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API