Legal Opinion
Calvillo v. Gonzalez
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1996No. 95-1149PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
On Application FOR WRIT of ERROR to the Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas
2Per curiam
In this ease, the court of appeals held that one party’s exclusive contract does not justify interference with another party’s prospective business relations as a matter of law. See 905 S.W.2d 416, 421-22. We disagree, and therefore we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Alfonso Gonzalez and Octavio Calvillo are both anesthesiologists with staff privileges at San Jacinto Methodist Hospital. Both provided anesthesiology to patients when requested. In 1989, the hospital contracted with…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Gonzalez v. San Jacinto Methodist Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
- Gonzalez v. San Jacinto Methodist Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
4Cited by78 opinions
- Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Financial Review Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SturgesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Hill v. Heritage Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
- Texas Disposal Systems Landfill, Inc. v. Waste Management Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.