Legal Opinion

Cook v. Hartman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2003No. 03-036PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Warner

¶1 Plaintiffs Richard Cook, Robin Cook (the Cooks), Wayne Parks (Parks), and Karen Carpenter (Carpenter), brought this action in the District Court for the Nineteenth Judicial District, Lincoln County, to establish a prescriptive easement on a road that crosses Defendant Darlene Hartman’s (Hartman) property, and to recover compensatory and punitive damages as a result of Hartman’s interference with the claimed easement. Hartman moved for partial summary judgment on all of the Plaintiffs’ easement claims. The District Court granted Hartman’s motion in part, with respect to the Cooks’ easement…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Minnie v. City of RoundupMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lee v. USAA Casualty InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Warnack v. Coneen Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Rieman v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Scott v. WeinheimerMontana Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown & Brown of MT, Inc. v. RatyMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. MEADOW LAKE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION v. ShoemakerMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hi-Tech Motors, Inc. v. BOMBARDIER MOTOR CORPORATION OF AMERICAMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Wolf v. OwensMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Gary & Leo's Fresh Foods, Inc. v. State, Department of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API