Legal Opinion
United States v. Raymond Maddox
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1968No. 11880_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOBELOFF, Circuit Judge:
Primarily on the strength of the testimony of a confessing accomplice, defendant was convicted under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 659 of the theft from a Baltimore warehouse of 24 one hundred-pound bags of sugar, worth more than $100. His appeal raises two issues: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to connect him with the theft, and (2) whether, at the time of the theft, the stolen goods constituted a part of an interstate or foreign shipment. 1
Landborn Company, a sugar broker and sole agent for the sale of Hi-Glo sugar in the United States, with principal offices in New York…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Champlain Realty Co. v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. James J. D'AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, J. A. Messer, Sr., Galax Mirror Co., Incorporated, and Mt. Airy Mirror Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- The United States of America v. Max Benjamin Berger, Sheldon Polakoff, Morris SatzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- McElroy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Mancil Washington Clark, A/K/A "Mauser,"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Arthur Wilson Cousins, United States of America v. Joe Armenta GanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. GimelstobCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Garber, Marvin, United States of America v. Denucci, NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.