Legal Opinion
United States v. Gimelstob
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 21, 1973No. Nos. 72-1622 to 72-1625PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge.
The central element in this case was a conspiracy to steal certain tin ingots from a warehouse in Port Newark, New Jersey, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659.
There were four counts to an indictment which named appellants and other defendants not revelant to this ease. The charges relating to appellants are as follows: all four appellants were charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 659 by conspiring to take, steal, and carry away goods in foreign commerce with the intent to convert these goods to their own use (Count I). They were also charged with…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Murrell BedfordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Michael FosherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. William Boyd, James D'metri, Michael J. Lipton, Stephen Powell, George ParrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.