Legal Opinion

Lackro v. Kao

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 2010No. Civil Action 10-940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Barry Laekro and Beverly Lackro (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this medical malpractice action as husband and wife seeking redress for injuries sustained during a braehytherapy procedure administered by Dr. Gary Kao (“Dr. Kao”) at the Philadelphia VA Medical Center (“PVAMC”). Dr. Kao, enclosing a certification of employment from the United States Attorney (“U.S. Attorney”), asserts that he was an employee of the United States during the time in question and that his actions were within the scope of his employment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. BAUTISTA v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  2. Chaney v. McBrideDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
  3. GIORDANO v. HOHNSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Omnipol, a.S. v. Multinational Defense Services, LCCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
  5. YOUNG v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API