Higginbotham v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Judge.
Appellant Martin Joseph Higginbotham was convicted of Driving Under the Influence of an Intoxicating Beverage and Causing the Death of a Human Being. Ind. Code 9-4 — l-54(b).
He appeals presenting two issues. First, did the trial court erroneously construe the causation requirement of Ind.Code 9 — 4—1— 54(b) and as a consequence erroneously instruct the jury about the elements of the offense? Second, did the trial court err by not permitting the defendant to cross-examine and argue about the return of his driver’s license and his release after the accident and breath test?
Defendant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Springer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Sears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Haeger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Borosh v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Micinski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- McCarthy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Pollard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Johnston v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Elliott v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.