Legal Opinion

Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 27, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered April 21, 1988, upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff-respondent-cross-appellant for brokerage fees in the amount of $4,534,427.78 together with interest thereon, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new trial, without costs.

The trial court failed to instruct the jury properly on the alternate theory of contract liability, because it omitted the necessary element of promissory intent, required, under the circumstances, for the creation of a binding obligation based upon defendant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Patrowich v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Patrowich v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Franklin v. Carpinello Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haywood v. University of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API