Legal Opinion

Seth v. Meyer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1987No. 2-86-132-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KELTNER, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of dismissal which resulted from one of the defendant’s plea in abatement.

Gary and Jean Seth sued Matthew Meyer, Gary Garrett and Gar-Don-Mey, Inc., all doing business as Artcraft Properties, pursuant to the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, for actions rising out of those defendants’ construction of an additional room to the Seths’ house. 1

Meyer filed a plea in abatement alleging that he was not personally liable to the plaintiffs, stating that their, “true cause of action” was against Gar-Don-Mey, Inc. At the plea in abatement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dolenz v. Continental National Bank of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Flowers v. Steelcraft CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Weatherford Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hearthshire Braeswood Plaza Ltd. Partners v. Bill Kelly Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Bernal v. Garrison, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
  3. Albert Lee Giddens v. Jarrett Huffman, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API