Dore v. Kinnear
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentNeill, J.
(dissenting) — A critical examination of the relevant facts and circumstances presented by this case convinces me that today’s majority opinion dictates a result precisely the opposite of what it purports to be — a result which disrupts revaluation programs throughout the state, and which prolongs a condition of property tax favoritism. The beneficiaries of today’s decision own, at most, 6 per cent of the taxable parcels of real estate in King County. These parcels are in an area of the county which enjoys something of a “tax shelter” in that it generally has not been revalued ■ since…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Carkonen v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Hamilton v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Skinner v. New Mexico State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Roon v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.