Legal Opinion

Shamis v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 23, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

(after stating tbe facts). Tbe operation of tbe bankruptcy laws of the United States cannot be defeated by proceedings under State statutes looking to the winding up of tbe bankrupt’s estate. Tbe bankruptcy law of tbe United States is paramount, and tbe jurisdiction of tbe Federal courts in bankruptcy, when properly invoked in tbe administration of tbe affairs of insolvent persons and corporations, is essentially exclusive. Hickman v. Parlin-Orendorff Co., 88 Ark. 519; Baxter County Bank v. Copeland, 114 Ark. 316; Morgan v. State, 154 Ark. 273.

Therefore, when involuntary proceedings in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harrower v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Hickman v. Parlin-Orendorff Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Zearing v. Crawford, McGregor & Camby Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Cherokee Construction Co. v. Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gordon v. DavisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
  2. McKnight v. National Surety Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1958
  3. Beneficial Finance Co. v. HillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API