Legal Opinion

Beneficial Finance Co. v. Hill

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1959No. 9121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AYRES, Judge.

Plaintiff, as the holder and owner of a promissory note payable to its order, ex*347-ecuted and signed October 17, 1957, by George H. Hill and Winnie L. Hill, husband and wife, seeks to recover a balance due thereon of $433.36, with 8 percent per annum interest thereon from judicial demand until paid, together with 20 percent additional of principal and interest as at'torney’s fees.

To plaintiff’s action, defendants first interposed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court ratione materiae and, later, an exception of no cause and of no right of ac■tion. The exception and plea were…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Forsyth & LimerickSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  2. Strang v. BradnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Friend v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Friend v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Meyer v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beneficial Finance Co. v. HillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API