Legal Opinion
Danzig v. Dikman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 23, 1980PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lupiano, J.
Defendant Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Greater New York (hereinafter Blue Cross) issued a “Group Contract” *304to defendants, the Queens County Bar Association and the Nassau County Bar Association, the “Contract Holder”. Plaintiff Daniel Danzig, a member in good standing of the Queens County Bar Association, applied for medical insurance under this group contract for himself (and for his spouse, plaintiff Ida Danzig, as a family member). Concomitant with plaintiff Daniel Danzig’s endeavoring to enroll and become a subscriber to this group insurance, he received a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Janneck v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Little v. Blue Cross of Western New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Walker v. . MillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Cassedy v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceNassau County District Court · 1968
- Cassedy v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1969
3Cited by23 opinions
- Donald F. Tackitt v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, United States of America, and Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Fields v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Behr v. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Lutsky v. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc. of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Novak v. TRW, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.