Legal Opinion

Cassedy v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 9, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In our opinion, the amendment to the group insurance policy, which was agreed upon between defendant and the trustee and plan administrator, was binding upon plaintiff’s testator and effective to reduce the maximum medical catastrophe expense benefits from $10,000 to $5,000 as of December 8, 1964. Since it is undisputed that defendant has paid to plaintiff the maximum amount due under the policy, as amended, the action must be dismissed.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs and complaint dismissed.

Glickman and Pittoni, JJ., concur; Coyle, P. J., not voting.

Judgment…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Danzig v. DikmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Reger v. National Ass'n of Bedding Manufacturers Group Insurance Trust FundNew York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API