Legal Opinion

Alamitos Land Co. v. Shell Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1935No. L. A. 13867PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Plaintiff and defendant, corporations, are respectively the lessor and lessee under an oil and gas lease touching lands in Los Angeles County, a part of the Signal Hill oil field. The lease is dated January 3, 1921, and was amended in certain particulars, respecting the production of gas only, on March 14, 1924. This action by plaintiff is one in equity to impeach as insufficient' and fraudulent the accounting made by defendant to plaintiff respecting its one-sixth owner’s royalty interest in the oil and gas produced and saved from the demised premises and to secure the confirmation, by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hammett Oil Co. v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morriss v. First Nat. Bank of MissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Schroeder v. Terra Energy, Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Alamitos Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Meyers v. the Texas Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API