Legal Opinion

Barthels v. Garrels

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. —Hon. Karl Kimmel, Judge. (1) The evidence offered by movements at' the hearing below was wholly insufficient to sustain the burden of proof placed upon them in this case. Thompson v. Steams, 197 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. —Hon. Karl Kimmel, Judge. (1) The evidence offered by movements at' the hearing below was wholly insufficient to sustain the burden of proof placed upon them in this case. Thompson v. Steams, 197 Mo. App. 354-356, 195 S. W. 45-46. (2) Where an attorney is employed on a contingent fee consisting of a percentage of the amount recovered, and the client compromises the case, the amount for which the case is settled is the basis on which the attorney’s percentage is to be computed. Curtis v. Metropolitan Street R. Co., 118 Mo. App. 341, 94 S.…

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal taken from an order of the circuit court setting aside the satisfaction of its judgment to the amount of the lien claimed thereon by the attorneys for the plaintiff.

Messrs. W.B. and Ford W. Thompson were attorney for August Barthels, plaintiff in a suit for libel instituted September 14, 1911, against W.L. Garrels, defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment rendered on April 23, 1913, for plaintiff, in the sum of nine thousand dollars, sixty-five hundred dollars being compensatory, and twenty-five hundred dollars exemplary or punitive damages. Mr. T. Percy Carr…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wait v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Curtis v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Taylor v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Morton v. ForseeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. Curtis v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Plaza Shoe Store, Inc. v. Hermel, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Jo B. Gardner, Inc. v. BeanlandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Fein v. SchwartzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. In Re DownsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Bovard v. BovardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API