Legal Opinion

Bovard v. Bovard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

— This is an appeal from the action of the trial court in overruling a motion to quash an execution.

The facts show that plaintiff, prior to the 15'th day of November, 1937, filed a suit for divorce against the defendant and that the court, on that day, sustained plaintiff’s motion for temporary alimony, suit money and attorney’s fees, allowing plaintiff the sum of $150 for attorney’s fees. The judgment recited:

“Further, the court doth sustain plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Alimony, Support and Maintenance, suit money and attorney’s fee in the following respect: The Court doth allow…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wait v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Curtis v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Waters v. WatersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  4. City of St. Louis v. MeintzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Mills v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Noll v. NollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Carrow Ex Rel. Simms v. CarrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Rutlader v. RutladerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Hogsett v. HogsettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Anderson v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API