Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Clements
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 25, 1975No. 50792PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Webb, Judge.
1. The duty of supervising the filing of the transcript of the evidence and proceedings rests with the trial court. Code Ann. § 6-809 (b); Rule 11 (c), Rules of the Supreme Court and of the Court of Appeals (Code Ann. §§ 24-4511, 3611); Southeastern Plumbing Supply Co. v. Lee, 232 Ga. 626 (208 SE2d 449); Candler v. Orkin, 129 Ga. App. 721, 722 (1) (200 SE2d 909). It is the duty of the trial court to grant such extensions of time, properly applied for, as may be necessary to enable the court reporter to complete the transcript (Code Ann. § 6-806; Elliott v. Leathers, 223 Ga. 497,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southeastern Plumbing Supply Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Elliott v. LeathersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Candler v. OrkinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Azar v. BairdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Cox Enterprises, Inc. v. Southland, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gilman Paper Company v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Department of Human Resources v. PattiloCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Hall v. BusseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Central of Georgia Railroad v. DEC Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.